The Business of Shaking Hands: By Dr. Harsh K. Luthar

Hand shaking is common to conducting business. Many people take pride in their grip which is meant to convey warmth, strength, and mutual respect. However, from a health perspective, this practice must now be viewed with caution. Almost 25% of the people do not wash their hands after using the toilet.

The October 8, 2007 issue of American Medical news (page 33) cites research, which reveals a large discrepancy between what people say they do and what they actually do after using a public bathroom.

According to a study commissioned jointly by the American Society for Microbiology, and the Soap and Detergent Association, 92% of the people claimed that they always wash hands after using a public restroom. However, observations in public places such as train stations and sports stadiums showed that, in fact, only 77% of the people washed their hands after using the restroom.

The study further reports that significantly more women (88%) than men (66%) wash their hands after using a public restroom. “Very clearly, guys need to step up to the sink,” said Brian Sansoni, Vice President of Communication for the Soap Association (October 8, 2007 American Medical News, p.33).

When you extend your hand to shake someone else’s, you will never hear the other person retreat and say, “Sorry, but I did not wash my hands after going to the toilet today.” Instead you are likely to get a strong, firm, and an enthusiastic handshake with a big smile possibly covering up an unpleasant truth.

It would appear that the good old handshake, which is meant to create trust between people, is potentially unhealthy unless both parties follow common sense and good personal hygiene. Perhaps the Chinese had it right all along in their custom of simply bowing their heads politely to other people instead of shaking their hands.

My brother and some Indian friends have suggested to me that a similar analysis is possible of the Indian greeting of “Namaste”. However, I am not sure about that. The Indian culture is different than the Chinese culture in some fundamental ways. Indians love to hold hands. I know that Indians love to hug. We even have a hugging saint named Ammachi. She spends a lot of time actively hugging people. See the link below.

India’s Hugging Saint

Anyway, back to the original topic.

Washing hands with soap and use of alcohol based rubs to sanitize hands have proven to be effective techniques in health care settings in reducing infection rates. Similarly, it is clear that carrying a hand sanitizer is a must for every business professional whose job involves shaking many hands everyday.

Of course, it may be politically incorrect for you to take out the sanitizer immediately after shaking someone’s hands. However, a relatively discrete application of the sanitizer a few minutes later would seem to be be acceptable. If someone notices it and asks, one can always say, “my hands are very dry. I always carry this lotion with me. Would you like try it?”

Another option would be to simply stop shaking hands. When someone offers their hand, you could say with warmth and sincerity, “I would much rather hug you.” Obviously, this is not the norm among business professionals today. But every custom must start somewhere with a brave person.

If hugging replaced handshaking, It could lead to a better world and possibly more harmony and global peace. Imagine, if all the world leaders, when they met, had to hug each other tightly for at least two minutes. Would things be better with long hugs? It’s hard to say but certainly worth a try.

MOTORAZR(2) V9m

image

Verizon Wireless formally announced that MOTORAZR2 V9m will become available to Verizon Wireless customers in September 2007. Clearly in competition with Apple’s iPhone, MOTORAZR2 V9m comes with external touch-sensitive keys for access to Verizon’s catalog of over two million songs. It also comes equipped with Bluetooth® stereo support for listening to music.

The MOTORAZR2 V9m has a 2.0 megapixel camera with 4x zoom and picture, video, text, and instant messaging (IM) capabilities.

MOTORAZR2 V9m has been strategically priced by Verizon to be about half of that of the iPhone.

Sprint and AT&T are releasing their own versions of the MOTORAZR2 V9m. Sprint, in fact, promises to release its version of the phone in August before Verizon. Interestingly, Sprint also beat Verizon in releasing their version of the HTC 6800 as well.

Strategically, AT&T releasing a MOTORAZR2 V9m makes sense. They will not lose customers to Sprint and Verizon who do not want to pay for the much higher priced iPhone.

For information on the Verizon’s MOTORAZR2 V9m, go to Verizon news URL listed below.

http://news.vzw.com/news/2007/08/pr2007-08-10.html

Engadget has good coverage of the release by all three carriers (Verizon, Sprint, and AT&T).

http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/10/sprint-verizon-both-announce-motorola-razr-2-v9m/

Google Should Diversify Its Strategy: By Dr. Harsh K. Luthar

Google’s recent announcement to start offering an integrated basket of its existing services (Gmail, Google Talk, Google Calendar, and Google Page Creator) for free is the next logical step in its strategy to challenge Microsoft in its traditional stronghold. With this move, Google is aiming to get small businesses, non profit organizations, and universities as clients.

Microsoft, in anticipation of this long awaited move, has started testing its Internet based service for small businesses called Office Live. Office Live Basics is being offered free by Microsoft and will continue to be free after the Beta period is over. However, Microsoft will start charging $29.95 a month for their premium services found in their “Office Live Collaboration” and “Office Live Essentials” services. These two are only free during the Beta period but not afterwards. Given the fact that Microsoft is entrenched in the desktop office space and its office products are already well integrated may give Microsoft more leverage to successfully offer premium Office Live services and charge for them.

Google needs to follow Microsoft’ s lead in offering its own premium services for a fee to add another dimension to its ad based revenue model. Google has indicated that it will indeed release a fee-based version of its service aimed at larger companies offering more data storage and technical support. Hey, but what about me Google? I am not a large company but I would like Google’s premium service and I would be willing to pay for it.

I have been wondering for a long time why Google does not offer premium services to its individual customers like Microsoft does. As soon as Google bought Blogger, they did away with the Blogger premium package and made it all free for everyone. Poof! No more premium Blogger. We don’t want your money loyal customers! What gives?

I have used the MSN paid premium service based on the MSN premium software which runs on top of my broadband service. It includes MSN mail and a number of other things for $9.95 a month. I am also a user of Google’s free services including Gmail, Picasa, Hello, Google Talk, Google Calendar, Blogger, Writely, …you name it and I have got it. I think Google free services are vastly superior to MSN paid premium services in every way. Gmail beats MSN mail in speed, functionality, and search any day of the week. Other than parental controls which come with the MSN premium software (which not everyone needs or wants), there is really nothing that MSN offers to justify charging $9.95 a month, except nice looking icons and colors.

Of course, Microsoft has known this for a long time which is why we have the introduction of Windows Live and a number of other initiatives being launched. As I have noted before, I am impressed with Microsoft’s recent moves. In particular, their desktop blogging application Windows Live Writer, squarely meets the demands of the blogging market and is in response to customers. So the way I see it, Microsoft is making amends and moving in the right direction. Maybe someday, I can say that my $9.95 a month for MSN premium are well spent. That day is not today. Basically by parting with my money monthly, I am investing in Microsoft’s future. I have my reasons for staying with MSN which I will go into some day. In part, I feel I have to use a product or a service before I can praise it or criticize it.

However, if I was paying $9.95 a month for an integrated package of Google services which included a well developed Writely that interfaced with the Google spreadsheet, a better Blogger, Google Page Creator with the ability to have my own domain name, extra storage for Gmail and all the other Google services, I would feel good. I would feel my money was well spent. So why is it that Google is not offering its premium services to loyal customers that want it? Why should Google’s premium service be only reserved for large enterprises? What would Google have to lose by having a two tiered structure of services like Microsoft does. Premium and Regular. They certainly would have a lot to gain. First, it is potentially another way to generate revenues independent of the ad based model. Second, having satisfied customers with increasing good will for Google is going to add to their future success.

My advice to Google. Start paying attention to your customers (Me!) and listen to what they want and need. Think outside the box.

Microsoft’s Counterpunch to Google: By Dr. Harsh K. Luthar

With the release of Windows Live Writer on August 11, 2006, Microsoft has delivered a winner for bloggers who want to use a desktop client.

I started experimenting with the Live Writer three days ago and was able to set it up easily to work with my WordPress blog. All the Live Writer needs is the user name and password and it automatically recognizes the type of blog you have and configures it self. Although Microsoft hopes that bloggers will use the Live Writer as a client for Windows Live Spaces, Microsoft has gone out of its way to make sure that it is compatible with other weblogs including Blogger, LiveJournal, TypePad, and WordPress. Frankly, given the history of Microsoft, I am pleasantly surprised and impressed with the Live Writer.

Prior to Live Writer, I was using Writely to blog my posts. Writely is the web based word processor that was bought by Google in March of 2006 and potentially poses a threat to Microsoft Word. However, Writley is very limited in that it can only be configured for one blog at a time. With Live Writer, one can maintain multiple blogs switching easily between them.

When Google bought Blogger in February 2003, it showed incredible foresight into the future of blogging and where the Internet was headed. However, Google appears to have squandered valuable time and the opportunity it had to improve the Blogger. It is only now that Blogger is getting a major upgrade from Google which will give it some of the features that WordPress has had for a while.

Microsoft, with the introduction of the Live Writer has delivered a strong counter punch to Google. First, like many Google products, Microsoft is offering the Live Writer for free. So people are going to try it! Most will like Live Writer because it is very user friendly. Second, for those individuals who were using Writely to blog, the Live Writer is a far superior choice. Third, by assuring that the Live Writer is compatible with Blogger, Typepad, LiveJournal, WordPress, and other formats, Microsoft is creating some good will among users which it needs very badly given its history.

Let’s face it. Whether you love or hate Microsoft, it has a record of coming from behind and catching up and even surpassing competitors. Google, however, is no Netscape. Although Google will remain the search king for the foreseeable future, it needs a very clear focus and a strategy to compete with Microsoft on other Internet fronts. Upgrading Blogger is a good move, although it could have been done much earlier. Google should not let Writely stagnate like that for years and ideally develop it as comprehensive blogging tool. That is where the future of the Internet is going.