<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon&#8217;s XV6800: Still In The Testing Phase? By Dr. Harsh K. Luthar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luthar.com/verizons-xv6800-still-in-the-testing-phase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luthar.com/verizons-xv6800-still-in-the-testing-phase/</link>
	<description>An Inquiry Into Life, Work, and Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thesaj</title>
		<link>http://luthar.com/verizons-xv6800-still-in-the-testing-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>thesaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luthar.com/2007/07/31/verizons-xv6800-still-in-the-testing-phase/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Bullshit....
Verizon&#039;s 6700 is buggy as all get up. And they released that almost 1/2 a year after Sprint did.
Somehow, Verizon&#039;s testing equates to a release 1/2 to more than a year later than other companies. With the result of uber-buggy phones.
So what&#039;s the point.  The truth of the matter is that Verizon&#039;s testing and our testing is two different things.
You and I want the phone company to test that the phone works, isn&#039;t buggy and does what it&#039;s supposed. And having a decent interface (ie: not require 7 clicks to close a program).
Verizon&#039;s idea of testing is how to ensure that you the user can&#039;t by-pass their system. Can&#039;t use features that might compete with their offerings, etc.
And yes, we&#039;re all sick of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullshit&#8230;.</p>
<p>Verizon&#8217;s 6700 is buggy as all get up. And they released that almost 1/2 a year after Sprint did.</p>
<p>Somehow, Verizon&#8217;s testing equates to a release 1/2 to more than a year later than other companies. With the result of uber-buggy phones.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the point.  The truth of the matter is that Verizon&#8217;s testing and our testing is two different things.</p>
<p>You and I want the phone company to test that the phone works, isn&#8217;t buggy and does what it&#8217;s supposed. And having a decent interface (ie: not require 7 clicks to close a program).</p>
<p>Verizon&#8217;s idea of testing is how to ensure that you the user can&#8217;t by-pass their system. Can&#8217;t use features that might compete with their offerings, etc.</p>
<p>And yes, we&#8217;re all sick of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gorkon</title>
		<link>http://luthar.com/verizons-xv6800-still-in-the-testing-phase/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>gorkon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luthar.com/2007/07/31/verizons-xv6800-still-in-the-testing-phase/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Verizon is very anal about their network.  Apparently passing FCC tests isn&#039;t enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon is very anal about their network.  Apparently passing FCC tests isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

